Taliban Splintered by Internal Divisions, External Spoilers

Read Time:5 Minute, 56 Second

The concinnity that pelted the Taliban to palm in Afghanistan is slivering under the pressure of internal divisions that could hang the group’s survival if rivals can not mend their differences while dealing with the realities of running a worried country.

Against a background of brewing profitable and philanthropic catastrophe, lines — and brands — have been drawn between two elderly Taliban numbers political leader Abdul Ghani Baradar, whoco-founded the group with Mullah Mohammad Omar and whose power base is in Kandahar, and sanctioned terrorist Sirajuddin Haqqani, who heads the related Haqqani network and is close to al Qaeda.

As Taliban coalitions battle for bigger slices of the pie, the original branch of the Islamic State is picking up rookies disabused with the political direction the Taliban are taking, security and academic sources said.

Amid the internal power struggle at the top of the Taliban, and the Islamic State reclamation drive, suggestions are arising of an alliance of lower jihadi groups commanded by Pakistan’sInter-Services Intelligence (ISI), attracting rudiments displeased with indeed the most extreme coalitions presently in control of Afghanistan.

The Islamic Invitation Alliance (IIA), funded by the ISI, was formed in early 2020 with the end of icing the Taliban’s palm, according to a document prepared for the former government of Afghanistan, seen by Foreign Policy. It now aims to destabilize the Taliban by empowering unreasonableness across Afghanistan, said an intelligence source involved in uncovering the group’s actuality, who spoke on condition of obscurity.

The emergence of the IIA, which sources say is known to theU.S. intelligence community, farther complicates Afghanistan’s fractious political geography as the country’s former abettors grapple with how to deal with a government controlled by sanctioned terrorists confederated to al Qaeda.

The fractionalization between Baradar, who cut the so- called peace deal in 2020 with formerU.S. President Donald Trump, and Haqqani, who introduced self-murder attacks to the Afghan battleground, is growing wider. Baradar, now interim deputy high minister, is seen as “ America’s man,” while Haqqani, acting innards minister, represents the group’s most stridentanti-Western face, which appeals to Pakistan, said Rahmatullah Nabil, the former head of intelligence for the former Afghan government.

He said divisions between the two men, who have an uneasy power-sharing agreement, are pushing Taliban bottom dogfaces into the arms of the Islamic State, challenging the Taliban’s control of Afghanistan, and risking the country’s stability and potentially indigenous peace.

“ Guerrilla fighting with medicine smuggling income is easier than running a state,” said Nabil, pertaining to the Taliban’s control of heroin product and trafficking. “ They’ve formerly faced several challenges, and their internal divisions are adding.”

Those divisions came public in September, shortly after the Taliban seized control of the country, and could be behind some recent high- casualty attacks attributed to the original Islamic State branch, known as the Islamic State-Khorasan (IS-K), according to Weeda Mehran, a conflict expert at the University of Exeter.

“ We knew the Taliban wasn’t a homogenous group. Nevertheless, we’re seeing violence between rival coalitions now getting more public,” she said. The Islamic State is a “ accessible goat” for attacks conceivably committed in the fratricidal battle for supremacy.

A recent attack on a Kabul military sanitarium, for case, killed a Haqqani supporter, Hamdullah Mukhlis, head of the capital’s service fraternity. Survivors of the attack told AFP that the bushwhackers chanted “ Long live the Taliban” and avoided areas of the sanitarium where Taliban fighters were being treated. IS-K claimed responsibility.

“ Baradar’s side can profit on two fronts — if they’re smart enough to play it like that They can insure they get their internal rivals with these huge attacks, and they can show the West they’re acting against IS-K to get support for dealing with the‘ new’terrorists,” Mehran said.

IS-K’s capabilities concern theU.S. Defense Department, where belief has taken root that it could pose a trouble to the United States in under a time. Recruiting endured fighters will only bolster those worries.

Colin Kahl, theU.S. undersecretary of defense for policy, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last month that the United States is fairly certain that both IS-K and al Qaeda have the “ intention” to attack theU.S. motherland.

Some reports have said IS-K is also absorbing members of the former state security forces as they try to avoid retributive attacks from the Taliban and earn plutocrat. Nabil said IS-K offers afghanis, or about$ 300, per month. Former Afghan National Defense and Security Forces help, still, have denied the reports.

IS-K and al Qaeda are part of an decreasingly complicated political mosaic as Pakistan’s ISI continues to insure it has influence over the Taliban and control of indigenous jihad. Both groups have been drawn under the IIA marquee, according to the exploration document, which has not been made public. It says the IIA grew out of ISI support for a group called Karwan Abu Obaida (KaO), which splintered from the Haqqani network after the Trump-Taliban agreement was inked in February 2020.

KaO was made up of Haqqani followers who were disappointed that the Haqqani network didn’t take action against Baradar and other Taliban leaders for negotiating with the United States, the document says.

“ From its commencement, KaO concentrated on targeted attacks against intelligencers, civil activists, and‘those who are against Islamic law,’as well as‘those who are supporting the agreements with the Americans zealots’and their abettors in Afghanistan,” the document says, quoting interlocutors.

It adds that the ISI originally stationed the KaO to extend the assassination crusade, which had a ruinous impact on government, civil society, and media in Afghanistan throughout 2020. The ISI also decided to expand its influence overnon-Taliban actors working to trip also-President Ashraf Ghani’s government, the document says, with the end of erecting a redoubtable jihadi force that could be a useful tool of political compulsion in the event of a Taliban palm.

During 2020, the IIA also came a platform for the return to the battleground of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Hekmatyar, a former warlord who struck a peace deal with Ghani in 2016 to return from exile, came disillusioned and “ approached the ISI for helpre-engaging with the insurrection,” the document says.

The main objects of the IIA, which figures an estimated fighters, are to “ keep the jihad movement in Afghanistan alive” and “ act as a tool of ISI pressure” on the Taliban to insure that Pakistan’s interests are defended, the document says.

It adds that the IIA is canalizing ISI backing to member groups and giving IS-K a boost by enabling it to claim responsibility for attacks committed by other groups in the coalition. This creates the eventuality for a tone- fulfilling vaticination by allowing IS-K to make an image of itself as an “ ascendant association in Afghanistan.”

Requests for comment on the report were made to Pakistan’s foreign ministry prophet and, independently, the public relations and information officer, as well as to Islamabad’s delegacies in Kabul and London, all without response.